Link exchange for small sites: how it works, what's allowed, where to start
"Link exchange" covers several very different things: a footer swap between two friends, a three-way scheme run by a link broker, and an honest article exchange between sites in the same niche. Search engines treat them differently, so it pays to know which one you are actually doing.
What people mean by link exchange
- Reciprocal links (A↔B). Two sites link to each other. One-off, relevant mentions between partners are normal on the web. Swapping links at scale, purely to cross-link, is not.
- Three-way exchange (A→B→C→A). Each site links to the next one in a circle, so no two sites link to each other directly. The shape hides the swap from a casual look, but it does not change the intent behind it. Our article on three-way link exchange goes through how it works and where it goes wrong.
- Article or guest post exchange. Sites publish useful articles about each other for their readers. The link is a side effect of the article, not the point of it. This is closer to guest posting than to a link swap.
- Paid placements. Money or another benefit changes hands for the placement. That is allowed for advertising, as long as the link is labelled.
What Google and Yandex actually say
Google's spam policies list "excessive link exchanges" and partner pages made only for cross-linking among the examples of link spam, together with buying or selling links that pass ranking credit. The same policy says what is fine: links that are bought for advertising or exchanged for some benefit should be qualified. Google's page on qualifying outbound links explains the attributes: rel="sponsored" for paid or compensated links, rel="ugc" for user content and rel="nofollow" for everything else you don't want to vouch for.
Yandex's webmaster help on links covers paid links and link exchanges too: they make it harder for Yandex to judge how much a site can be trusted, and the page recommends marking such links with rel="sponsored".
The short version: the problem is not that two sites mention each other. The problem is links arranged in order to manipulate rankings, especially when they are hidden as editorial links. The shape of the arrangement (two-way, three-way, ten-way) does not change that. Our guide to link exchange and Google's rules covers the details, and nofollow vs sponsored vs ugc explains which attribute to use where.
What a safe exchange looks like
- The article is written for the host's readers. If you would not publish it without the link, it is not worth publishing with one.
- The partner is relevant and real. Similar topic, real visitors, a site that has existed for a while. Learn how to spot PBN sites before you agree to anything.
- The link is labelled. Exchanged and paid links carry
rel="sponsored", and the article is marked as partner content. - Volume stays natural. A few relevant mentions a month from sites of your level look like what they are: partnerships. Hundreds of identical placements look like a scheme.
- You measure readers, not "link juice". Visits, brand searches and mentions in your niche are the result you can check. Nobody can honestly promise you positions.
How the Satelo exchange works
Satelo is built around the safe version of the idea. Sites of a similar level and topic publish partner articles about each other in circles (A→B→C→A), never directly A↔B. Hosting an article earns you satellites (◉), the internal currency; you spend them on articles about your own site on other sites in the network. Links in exchange articles are published with rel="sponsored", and every site gets an open Quality Score so partners can see who they are dealing with.
Satelo is in public beta and the network is still small, so matching takes time in some niches. If you'd rather compare options, see how Satelo stacks up against established guest post marketplaces.
When link exchange is a bad idea
Skip it if the partner's site has no real traffic, covers everything from casinos to recipes, sells "dofollow" placements in bulk, or asks you to hide the link from labelling. Skip it too if your own site has nothing worth recommending yet: link building for new websites starts with one genuinely useful page, not with swaps.
How link exchange works
Building links safely
Link attributes, anchors and risks
Platforms and exchanges
FAQ
Is link exchange against Google's rules?
Excessive link exchanges made only for cross-linking are listed as link spam in Google's spam policies. Occasional relevant mentions between partners are normal, and exchanged or paid links should be marked with rel="sponsored".
Is a three-way link exchange safer than a direct swap?
Not by itself. A circle A→B→C→A only changes the shape. What matters is intent, relevance, volume and labelling: useful articles on relevant sites with rel="sponsored" links are the safer pattern.
Which rel attribute should exchanged links use?
rel="sponsored". Google asks to use it for links that are paid or given in exchange for a benefit, and Yandex recommends the same for paid links.
How many exchange links per month is too many?
There is no published safe number. Keep volume in line with the real partnerships you have, and stop if placements start to look identical or come from unrelated sites.
How is Satelo different from a link exchange network?
Satelo exchanges labelled partner articles in circles between sites of a similar level and topic, never direct swaps. You earn satellites for hosting and spend them on articles about your site. It does not sell dofollow links or promise rankings.
Is Satelo free?
The article exchange is free: you pay with satellites earned by hosting articles. Satellites can also be bought, and Satelo takes a 10% fee on exchanges and marketplace orders. Satelo is in public beta.
Check your site's Quality Score
Free, no sign-up: a 0–100 score from mostly open data. Then add your site to Satelo and get partner articles from sites of your level.
Enter a domain like example.com
Add my site